Helping To Avoid Insurance Claims Being Repudiated

by: HarveyWilliams
Total views: 23 | Word Count: 1832

For many years perhaps right up until the Thatcher years of the 1980s attitudes in business and towards insurance companies in particular, were different; clients tended to remain with the same insurance company for years and there was considerably less "shopping around" than there is today. In turn the insurance company's approach to the client was different; if you were a loyal client that had been with the company for years they would on occasions consider paying a claim that they might have otherwise rejected. In today's more commercial world, for an Insurance company to pay a claim, where they believe they have grounds for declining it, the claimant would need to be a very sizeable client, representing a considerable amount of profitability to the company, loyalty is unlikely to play a part in the decision.

Although it is not widely known, most contract hire companies have a form of fall back insurance for their contract hire vehicles; this can covers them if the hirer has an accident and their insurer refuses to pay out. Of course the contract hire company will then hold the hirer liable for any loss, but on occasions the hirer is a limited company that subsequently goes into liquidation. If there are no personal guarantees in place then the contract hire company has no means of recovering its money other than to claim on their own insurance. Nowadays contract hire companies are seeing an increasing number of cases where claims are being repudiated. The more serious the accident, the more closely the insurance company will investigate a claim. After all they have to look after their shareholders interests, paying claims where the insurer or driver have not complied with the terms and conditions of the insurance, is not looking after the shareholders interests.

Most insurance company's terms and conditions state that the vehicle must comply with the manufacturer's specifications, so the vehicle must not be modified in any way without informing the insurance company. That is why it is advisable to always fit the manufacturers recommended tyres. Employees should be told that under no circumstance should there be any modification made to the engine of their company car. It is not unheard of for employees to have the engine of their company vehicle "chipped" this is a process that changes the way the engine control unit manages the engine and increases the brake horsepower of the vehicle. This would give an insurance company a very good reason to refuse to pay out on a claim, if the vehicle is involved in an accident. In any event it will invalidate the vehicle's warranty.

Also the company car must be kept in a roadworthy condition. If a company vehicle is on contract hire, then there is usually not much to worry about; it will on average be less than two years old and regularly serviced and maintained. In a case where a company buys and keeps it's vehicles for longer than the typical contract hire term, maybe four or five years, then ensuring they are, in what an insurance company would consider is a roadworthy condition, can be more difficult. The risk of a vehicle developing a fault that could make it un-roadworthy generally increases, the higher the mileage.

Of course it is not only the lack of maintenance that can cause a vehicle un roadworthy; depending on the circumstances of an accident, having the wrong tyre pressure, where the tyres are unevenly, over or under inflated could cause the insurance company to deem the vehicle to be in an un roadworthy condition. Incorrect tyre pressure can affect road holding, steering, braking and the overall handling of a vehicle and in an accident can often be a contributory factor, particularly in wet conditions. If a vehicle is involved in an accident, it is not unusual for the insurance company to check that the car is roadworthy; it is in their interests to do so. Of course if the circumstances of the accident were such that it is clear that the accident has been caused by another vehicle, this would not be a factor.

If an accident happens under different circumstances, for example where an employee's car crashes on a bend or skids out of control and causes the accident, then it is quite reasonable that the insurance company will want to ensure that the vehicle was in a roadworthy condition. Incorrect tyre pressure is one of the most common causes of newer cars being un- roadworthy. Employers should advise their employees that tyre pressures need to be checked regularly. This is best done in the morning whilst the tyres are still cold. Another good reason for ensuring that tyre pressures are correct is that it can significantly reduce the company's fuel bill.

Tyres do need to be checked for wear; probably the most practical option is to make the employee responsible. It is after all his car and his life that is at risk if he drives the vehicle in an un- roadworthy condition. The period between servicing intervals nowadays can be very long indeed. Previously, when a typical servicing interval was 12,000 miles, companies used to rely on the dealership's servicing department telling them if a tyre needed changing. That is no longer a practical option; indeed some would question whether it is ever a practical option, to rely on a servicing department, because they do appear to have a habit of changing tyres before they need to be changed.

Another risk to the company is employees driving whilst under the influence of alcohol or drugs, an insurance company will not generally pay out if there is an accident under these circumstances. How many of your employees stop of for a "couple" of pints on the way home? In a study carried out in 1998, alcohol was a factor in 10% of fatal motorcycle accidents and 19% of cars and other vehicles involved in fatal crashes. In spite of greater awareness nowadays there are still drivers who seriously believe that they drive better after consuming alcohol. The evidence however shows that alcohol seriously impairs psychomotor skills and affects the brains ability to process information.

Companies should also be aware that if an employee drives his company car and has an accident whilst under the influence of drugs, the company could also find itself without insurance. Unfortunately there are also prescription drugs that can affect the ability to drive safely. It is however an employer's responsibility to ensure the safety of its employees; it may be safer for an employee to ask its employees to advise them if they are taking a medicine that may affect their driving ability, after all many drugs companies advise the user not to operate machinery, or drive whilst taking a particular medication.

Another risk is when the insurance company believe that a loss has been caused by negligence on the part of the driver. An example of this would be where an employee has left his car, either on the drive or in the road, with the engine running; many do this in the winter so that when they get into the car, it is already heated up. If an employee does this, or leaves the keys in the car when at the petrol station and an opportunistic thief jumps in and drives off, the insurance company is unlikely to pay out.

It is important to ensure that all your drivers have a current driving license and that previous convictions like drink driving, if required by the insurer, have been declared. Some employers have never seen more that a photocopy of their employees' driving licence, others take a photocopy of the original and hold it on file. This is very unsatisfactory from the company's point of view. There have been cases of it emerging after an accident that the employee was driving whilst disqualified.

If a company's vehicles are sourced through a broker, the larger and well established contract hire brokers are able to offer a service where they regularly check the employee's driving licences. They can be checked when they are first employed and then at regular intervals, to make sure there are no new convictions. Once employees are aware this system is in place they are much more likely to come forward and declare a new conviction. Apart from protecting the company as far as it's insurance is concerned; it also affords it protection from prosecution under the new legislation.

If an insurer refuses to pay out on a claim, one should not be necessarily assume that they are correct in doing so. There is the Financial Ombudsman that will deal with any complaints or disputes in this respect. In a case we are aware of, one of our clients had his vehicle carjacked, the insurance company refused to pay out the claim of 60,000, because they said that they had written to him on a number of occasions telling him that he must fit Tracker to the vehicle, which he had not done. They argued that had tracker been fitted, the vehicle might have been recovered. However when an expert was called in on behalf of the client, things changed. Our understanding is that the expert stated that whilst the insurer had indeed written to the client with regard to Tracker, they had not at any time told him he would be uninsured without it. The claim was settled.

To summarise, it is important to ensure that vehicles are properly maintained and that tyres are regularly checked for wear and the pressures should be checked ideally every two weeks. Employees should be prohibited from making any modification to their company vehicle and should heed any warning lights that come up on the screen of their vehicle. They should also be warned about driving whilst under the influence of alcohol or drugs and encouraged to speak to the company if they are on any type of medication that may affect their ability to drive safely. Vehicles should not be started and left to warm up on a cold day and keys should not be left in the car whilst in a petrol station or whilst quickly popping into the shops. Opportunistic thieves only take seconds to steal a car. Speak to a contract hire broker, about licence checking, it is vital that all companies have these checks carried out. The aforementioned will at least go some way, to avoiding a situation where an insurer refuses to pay out on a claim.

Negligence is a major factor when motor insurance companies refusing to pay claims. There was a reported case in the United States, apparently perfectly true, where the purchaser of a new motor home set out on a journey and after setting the vehicle to cruise control, went to the back of the vehicle to fix himself a drink. Understanding that cruise control meant the vehicle would drive itself. Not surprisingly it crashed. Of course being America he was able to sue the manufacturer for not telling him that, cruise control doesn't work like that.

About the Author

For more information about contract hire, lease purchase, finance lease or vehicle hire purchase in the UK please contact Bowater Price plc http://www.bowaterprice.com Tel - 01494 536 536.  

More Articles from: Insurance